Someone I know posted this article on their Facebook page yesterday. It’s about an openly gay Israeli soldier who proudly served in his military. The basic point of the article was to pose the question “if a country like Israel allows homosexuals to serve in the military without incident, isn’t it time to repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’?”
I say no.
A little background for those of you who don’t know me personally. I happen to be gay. My sexuality is not a secret among the people I’m close to-it’s just not generally something I announce. I would assume a reasonably large chunk of my business associates and some of my coworkers are unaware-it’s not their business. I’m not ashamed of anything. It’s just not something that needs to be discussed in a professional context.
Anyhow, I write that to make it obvious that I have no issues with alternative sexual orientations-this isn’t coming from the perspective of a homophobe.
My main issue with the possibility of “don’t ask…” being repealed is that it will put some of our gay and lesbian military personnel in jeopardy. We don’t live in a Utopian society. There are still a lot of people out there in this country who are openly hostile towards gay men and lesbians. There are just as many people who appear to be tolerant on the outside, but internalize their hostility so as to appear “politically correct”. If gays are allowed to serve openly in the military, who’s to say that they won’t be victims of verbal and physical harassment? Your response would probably be “well, there are laws in place (or there would be) designed to discipline those who harass other soldiers”. And I totally understand that. But how effective are those laws gonna be?
Again, this is not a Utopian society.
Here’s a hypothetical. Soldier A is a gay man. Soldier B is a straight guy and was raised to believe homophobia is evil, or maybe he feels threatened by homosexuals because of his own sexual confusion. Soldier A, Soldier B and their boys go on leave for a few days and go away for the weekend with a few of their boys. Everybody gets liquored up, Soldier A and Soldier B retire back to their room, and they somehow end up having sex (that is NOT outside the realm of possibility, folks). There’s a good chance that Soldier B will be completely freaked the fuck out-is it possible that he might assault or even kill Soldier A so that the story doesn’t get out? I think so. Most likely, that situation has already occurred at least once-even with the current rules in place.
If “don’t ask, don’t tell” was to be repealed, do you think Soldier A or Soldier A’s family would have an easier time getting justice? Depends on how much faith you have in the military and our government to deliver you the true story. I’m not a conspiracy theorist myself, but I certainly think that the military and the government spin stories for their benefit. Remember Pat Tillman? So how farfetched is it to think that out men and women in the military might get harassed or verbally or physically assaulted because of their sexual orientation, report it to their superiors, and then the whole thing gets swept under the rug so it doesn’t leak to the press?
I’m not an advocate for living a closeted existence (unless, of course, you choose to. That’s your prerogative). However, I think there are situations where being out and open about one’s sexuality can be a severe hindrance, and this might be one of them. Equality for all is a great thing, but in this case, I think the thing that should be the same across the board is silence.
5 comments
Sepehr says:
Mar 3, 2010
Hey dig your blog alot thanks for the great writing.
On the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell issue..
Am I missing something here because my understanding is that the existing law makes it illegal for openly gay and lesbian people from serving in the military. To repeal this law is to give people the choice to declare their sexuality – by no means does it require them to. So, if this is correct, then I don’t understand your opposition or logic at all. If somebody wants to keep it a secret for the practical reasons you stated they by all means are at liberty to do so. But the issue is the principle of being able to be open about it, no?
blerdwords says:
Mar 3, 2010
I think the point I’m trying to make is that it maybe isn’t such a good idea to allow people to declare their sexuality if they choose to. Granted, they’re responsible for the ramifications if they do so, but it’s entirely possible that they might not understand what could potentially happen should they decide to come out.
Sepehr Vakil says:
Mar 3, 2010
Hmmmmmm that doesn’t sit well with me at all. I get where you are coming from, but taking somebody’s rights away from them in the name of protecting them is a rather lethargic step towards justice, at best. And it will be interpreted by most as a thinly veiled act of discrimination.
blerdwords says:
Mar 3, 2010
And if everything was on the up and up, it wouldn’t sit well with me either. Like I said in the post, ideally people should be able to declare their sexual orientation (or not) without any fallout. But you know and I know that if “don’t ask” is overturned, it’s gonna be open season on those who choose to reveal this information, and the military is gonna do whatever they can to cover up the incidents of violence that occur. A lot of stuff will happen that we likely will never hear about. Justice is a great thing to obtain, but true justice in this instance is going to take a lot of time (if it ever does happen) and there are going to be serious casualties. I don’t have enough faith in the military or our justice system to believe that the letter of the law would be followed if “don’t ask” was to be repealed.
Blerditorial: The DADT Repeal & Keeping It Honest | popblerd.com says:
Dec 20, 2010
[…] obviously a controversial move, and I applaud the Senate for doing the right thing. I posted an article on this a while back, and probably should take this opportunity to clarify my […]